ORGANIC MATTER AND NITROGEN REMOVAL CAPACITY OF A NEW PACKING FOR TRICKLING FILTERS

  • T.J. Muñoz-Sánchez Universidad de las Américas Puebla, Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Alimentos y Ambiental
  • R. Reyes-Mazzoco Universidad de las Américas Puebla, Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Alimentos y Ambiental
Keywords: nitrogen removal, organic load removal, structured packing, trickling filter

Abstract

The robust organic matter removal in a new packing is intended as pretreatment for wetland polishing of wastewater. The packing was tested with very high organic loads, ranging from 19.41 to 69.45 kg COD/m3d, and hydraulic loads between 2.55 and 3.82 m3 /m2d. The effects of flow and concentration of whey on the removal of organic matter were studied using a factorial experimental design, and results confirmed that both variables and the interaction of them affected the removal efficiency. This result confirms that the organic load defines the behavior of a trickling filter. Total nitrogen levels were reduced by an average of 33%, and ammonium nitrogen was reduced by 57% through cellular assimilation. The kinetic constant was 0.3059 kg COD/m2d with 26 m2/m3 of specific area, in contrast to 0.0693 kg COD/m2d obtained in previous work, where a similar packing design was used with 49 m2/m3 of specific area. These results suggest that at moderate organic loads the higher available volume for air flow increases the reaction rate. The kinetic model also showed a lower constant value with less specific area, indicating that the removal capacity of very high organic loads was reduced.

References

Balakrishnan, S. and Eckenfelder, W. (1969). Nitrogen relationship in biological processes-II. Water Resources 3, 167-174.

Brentwood Industries, Inc. (2009). Technologies for Water & Wastewater Treatment, Trickling Filter System Design & Application. Available in http://www.brentwoodprocess.com/ tricklingfilters.html. Accesed: 9 September 2010.

Crites, R. and Tchobanoglous, G. (1998). Small and Decentralized Wastewater Management Systems. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Eckenfelder, W.W. (1980). Principles of water quality management. CBI Publishing Co. Inc., Boston.

Dempsey, M.J., Lannigan, K.C. and Minall, R.J. (2005). Particulate-biofilm, expanded-bed technology for high-rate, low-cost wastewater treatment: Nitrification. Water Research 29, 965-974.

Elmitwalli, T.A., van Lier, J., Zeeman, G. and Lettinga, G. (2003). Treatment of domestic sewage at low temperature in a two-anaerobic step system followed by a trickling filter. Water Science and Technology 48, 199-206.

Harremöes, P. (1982). Criteria for nitrification in fixed-films reactors. Water Science and Technology 14, 167-187.

Gebert, W. and Wilderer, P.A. (2000). Heating up trickling filters to tackle cold weather conditions. Water Science and Technology 41, 163-166.

González-Brambila, M. and López-Isunza, F. (2008). Comportamiento de un reactor de biopelícula para tratamiento de agua residual a diferentes velocidades de flujo (Membrane-attached biofilm reactor behavior under different flow rate conditions in the treatment of a synthetic wastewater). Revista Mexicana de Ingeniería Química 7, 183-193.

Guitonas, A. and Alexiou, G. (1995). Performance of a two stage plastic media trickling filter in Greece. Water Science and Technology 32, 125- 132.

Kornaros M. and Lyberatos G. (2006). Biological treatment of wastewaters from a dye manufacturing company using a trickling filter. Journal of Hazardous Materials 136, 95-102.

Krüner, G. and Rosenthal, H. (1983). Efficiency of nitrification in trickling filters using different subtrates. Aquacultural Engineering 2, 49-67.

Levenspiel, O. (1989). The Chemical Reactor Omnibook, OSU Book Stores, Inc., Oregon.

Melcer, H., Parker, W.J. and Rittmann, B.E. (1995). Modeling of volatile organic contaminants in trickling filter systems. Water Science and Technology 31, 95-104.

Metcalf & Eddy. (2004). Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.

Montgomery, D. and Runger, G.C. (2003). Applied statistics and probability for engineers. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., United States of America.

Persson, F., Wik, T., Sorensson, F. and Hermansson, ¨ M. (2002). Distribution and activity of ammonia oxidizing bacteria in a large full-scale trickling filter. Water Resources 36, 1439-1448.

Reyes-Lara, S. and Reyes-Mazzoco, R. (2009). Efecto de las cargas hidraulica y orgánica sobre la eficiencia de remoción de un empaque estructurado en un filtro percolador (Effect of hydraulic and organic load on the mass removal of a structured packing in a trickling filter). Revista Mexicana de Ingeniería Química 8, 101-109.

Sharma, B. and Ahlert, R.C. (1977). Nitrification and nitrogen removal. Water Resources 11, 897- 925.

Spellman, F.R. (2009). Handbook of Water and Wastewater Treatment Plant Operations. CRC Press Company, Florida

van den Akker, B., Holmes, M., Cromar, N. and Fallowfield, H.R. (2010). The impact of organic carbon on the performance of a high rate nitrifying trickling filter designed to pre-treat potable water. Water Science and Technology 61, 1875-1883.

van Haandel, A. and van der Lubbe, J. (2007). Handbook Biological Wastewater Treatment. Quist Publishing, Netherlands

Vanhooren, H., Verbrugge, T., Boeije, G., Demey, D. and Vanrolleghem, P.A. (2001) Adequate model complexity for scenario analysis of VOC stripping in a trickling filter. Water Science and Technology 43, 29-38.

Wijffels, R. H. and Tramper, J. (1994). Nitrification by immobilized cells. Enzyme Microbial Technology 17, 482-492.

Wuertz, S., Bishop, P.L. and Wilderer, P.A. (2008). Biofilms in Wastewater Treatment: An Interdisciplinary Approach. IWA Publishing, London.
Published
2020-04-14
How to Cite
Muñoz-Sánchez, T., & Reyes-Mazzoco, R. (2020). ORGANIC MATTER AND NITROGEN REMOVAL CAPACITY OF A NEW PACKING FOR TRICKLING FILTERS. Revista Mexicana De Ingeniería Química, 11(2), 279-286. Retrieved from http://www.rmiq.org/ojs311/index.php/rmiq/article/view/1561
Section
Environmental Engineering