• R. Maya-Yescas
  • D. Salazar-Sotelo
  • E. Mariaca-Domínguez
  • S. Rodríguez-Salomón
  • L.M. García-Moreno
Keywords: catalytic cracking, emulation, pilot plant, reactors


Due to necessity to predict accurately the performance of fluidized-bed catalytic cracking (FCC) industrial units, after feedstock or catalyst is changed, use of pilot plant as emulation devices has been increasing. Among these pilot plants, the Recirculation Catalyst Pilot Plant is the small-scale simulator that closer matches the behaviour of industrial units. This kind of pilot plants consists of riser, stripper, regenerator and separation column that perform duties similar to those of industrial units. Additionally, this pilot plant is able to operate using a descendant flow reactor (downer) in order to emulate several technological trends; which operation mode promises better selectivity. FCC process involves many variables interconnected in complex way, making a difficult task to predict its performance when operating far from original design conditions. Nevertheless, using the same catalyst, the same feedstock and the same main operating conditions of industrial units, it is possible to emulate the performance of industrial units in pilot plant. In this work, the characteristic relationship between pilot plant and industrial units is shown with examples of emulation, establishing its importance in research and support of technical services. Scaleup problems are addressed and solutions that mimic operating data from an industrial plant are found. Conversion results are shown graphically to easily assess industrial potential benefits that can be drawn from pilot plant emulation


Boock L.T. and Zhao X. (1998). Recent Advances in FCC Catalyst Evaluations: MAT vs. DCR Pilot Plant Results. Chemical Industry 74, 131-141.

Dienert J.M., Renfree M. and Holden I.A.. (1993). On-Line Simulation of Commercial Adiabatic FCCU Operation with a FCC Pilot Plant. AIChE Symposium Services 88, 54-58.

Ikeda S. and Ino T. (1999). Down-Flow FCC Pilot Plant for Light Olefin Production. Proceeding of the Symposium on Advances in Fluid Catalytic Cracking American Chemical Society. New Orleans, LA. August 22-26, 1999.

Leuenberger E.L., Moorehead E.L.and Newell D.F. (1988). Effects of Feedstock Type on FCC Overcracking. Proceedings of the NPRA Annual Meeting, San Antonio TX, March 20-22, AM-88-51.

Mariaca-Domínguez E., Rodríguez-Salomón S. and Maya-Yescas R. (2003). Reactive Hydrogen Content: A Tool to Predict FCC Yields. International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering 1, A46, 2003. http://www.bepress.com/ijcre/vol1/A46.

Maya-Yescas R., León-Becerril E. and Salazar- Sotelo D. (2004). On the Translation of MAT Kinetic Data for the Modelling of Industrial Catalytic Cracking Units. Chemical Engineering and Technology 27, 777-780.

Young G.W., Weatherbee G.W. and Davey S.W. (1988). Stimulating Commercial FCC Yields with the Davidson Circulating Riser Pilot Unit. Proceedings of the NPRA Annual Meeting, San Antonio TX, March 20-22, AM-88-52.
How to Cite
Maya-Yescas, R., Salazar-Sotelo, D., Mariaca-Domínguez, E., Rodríguez-Salomón, S., & García-Moreno, L. (2020). FLUIDIZED-BED CATALYTIC CRACKING UNITS EMULATION IN PILOT PLANT. Revista Mexicana De Ingeniería Química, 5(2), 97-103. Retrieved from http://www.rmiq.org/ojs311/index.php/rmiq/article/view/1878